Sunday, October 11, 2015

An Open Letter to Fellow Indians: Beware! Enemies of the nation on the loose


An  Open Letter to Fellow Indians
Beware! Enemies of the  nation on the loose
By Dr Akhileshwari Ramagoud, Journalist and Academic

Dear Fellow Indians,
Am I the only one who is terrified at the turn things have taken in our country? Am I right in seeing a conspiracy by the BJP and its mother the RSS, to destroy the idea of India as we and our ancestors several generations away have always known it as? Am I being harsh in dismissing as stupidly naïve those who are confident that India is too ancient and strong to be rocked by the present trends of intimidation, terrorising, and putting an entire community on the defensive? Am I being excessively pessimistic when I begin to think that perhaps after all, our country is not as inclusive, generous, expansive, tolerant as we believed it to be? If it was indeed all that, then how could Indians elect Narendar Modi and BJP, who are anti-thesis of what India stands for? And that too with an unbeatable majority in the Parliament? This strength is precisely that brought out the neo-Nazis of the RSS out of the woodwork. This confidence of unshakeable majority in the Parliament for the next four years has emboldened the RSS and its myriad offshoots and avatars across India, to take up its agenda of ‘purifying’ India, of restoring the voice of the Hindus that was ‘stolen’ by ‘pseudo secularists’ and handed over to the minorities to ‘appease’ them. According to them, India had been mortagaged to the minorities ever since Independence by Congress in return for their votes. The Hindus were given the short shrift and hence, they who are in majority, are the aggrieved ones. Therefore, the time has come to do ‘justice’ to Hindus by restoring their rightful position to them, restore their ‘glorious’ history to them, and importantly, restore to them theirpride that had taken a beating not only by several generations of Muslim rule but also by Congress in post-independence times. An integral part of the RSS/BJP agenda is to purge the country of all ‘foreign’ influences and  culture either by force (as in demonising jeans and beating up of young girls in pubs)  or  enforcing submission through violence, threats, and other insidious ways of exclusion of the ‘other’. The RSS ideologues believe that this agenda can and will be implemented, nay, imposed through the tyranny of  the numerical advantage that the Hindus have.
A  pattern has emerged in the last one year of Narender Modi and BJP being in power in taking forward the agenda of RSS of intimidating and making the minorities and anti-Hindutva forces in India fall in line or fall silent: like the lone wolf attacks, target and eliminate one person. As in the instance of Dadri murder of Mohammed Akhlaq. As in the instance of the murder of M M Kalburgi, of the public humiliation and beating up of a Muslim man in Karnataka for being in the company of a Hindu girl, as in the defacement of the statue of Mary in Delhi, in the rape of  a nun, as in the filing of cases over comments on Facebook in Kerala recently and in Mumbai, as in the killing of journalists, as in the serving of legal notices to media houses...The list is  long.
The idea is that no longer RSS has to prove the ‘machismo’ of the Hindu, who they believe is seen, especially Muslim minorities as weak, whose meek nature is interpreted as incapable of being aggressive and whose espousal of ahimsa hides the incapacity of the Hindu to defend  both the faith and fellow Hindus. This belief RSS propagates as the reasons for the defeat of Hindu rulers at the hands of the Muslim invaders and the reasons for the Muslim rule for several generations. The Hindus proved such perceptions as wrong in 2002 in Gujarat (as Congress proved it in 1984). But 2002 proved very costly since the mass scale massacre of Muslims brought international disrepute and proved to be tough stain to be washed away. Therefore, this strategy of ‘death by one thousand cuts’. According to this ancient Chinese method of torture called lingchi that was reserved for the worst crimes, a person was executed by inflicting several cuts on the person till the person died from pain and loss of blood. An interpretation of this phrase is that while one small cut may not kill a person, a thousand small cuts will do the job. Since the RSS considers not just Muslims and Christians as the enemy but all Hindu secularists, Hindu rationalists and declared Hindu atheists, they too are being targeted, one by one. The goal is to terrorise into submission and eliminate if possible, all those opposed to Hindutva.
My dear fellow Indians, we clamoured for Modi to break his silence over the Dadri murder, we asked why he could find time to message Navjot Singh Siddhu over his illness but not for either the family of Akhlaq or the citizens who are feeling horrified or nervous over the turn of events? Well, he  did break his silence  apparently indirectly prompted by the President Pranab Mukherjee who spoke about the ‘core values’ of Indian civilisation of diversity, plurality and tolerance being ‘wasted’. And what did Modi say?  “..Hindus should decide whether to fight Muslims or poverty. Muslims have to decide whether to fight Hindus or poverty. Both need to fight poverty together. The country has to stay united, only communal harmony and brotherhood will take the nation forward. People should ignore controversial statements made by politicians, as they are doing so for political gains.”
This is what I would call a political sleight of hand. He neither expresses sorrow at the gruesome  and senseless death of Akhlaq nor does he condemn violence let loose by his fellow Hindutva travellers. Instead he twists the message and puts the blame on politicians for  making ‘controversial statements’ for ‘polical gains.’ He also misleads people by stating rhetorically Hindus and Muslims should decide whether they will fight each other or poverty. Really? The decision was made FOR us in our names, Hindus and respectively, by communal organisations in one of which Modi was schooled. No Hindu or Muslim is interested in fighting each other as a majority of us have a bigger fight, an existential  one, on our hand.
My dear fellow Indians, we are being taken for a ride yet again by minimising the danger facing this country’s social fabric woven over hundreds of years of harmonious, pluralistic co-existence with people of different faiths, languages and races. We are being  told that ‘fringe elements’ of Hindutva are the ones guilty of the excesses in the past one year, whether it  was  love  jihad or attacking college students fraternising with their friends belonging to a different religion. Let us not spare media here. The media is the main culprit in labelling the law-breakers as ‘fringe elements’. Can I say that they are no more  fringe than you and I? They represent the mainstream Hindutva beliefs of hatred for the ‘other’ and imposing their will through violence and intimidation. They represent the mainstream Hindutva belief that India should be a “Hindu Rashtra” where the minorities live either at the mercy of  Hindus or all the minorities should adopt Hinduism. Surely, they have not taken upon themselves voluntarily to kill or assault people; there is a deliberate strategy to send out the message to the people that Hindutva is here to stay for the nextfour years. It is clear that with Modi at  the head of the government, this is the time for the Hindutva ideology to consolidate itself. That is why,  my dear fellow Indians, I am terrified at the prospect of  this looming disaster. I  fear that Hindutvawadis are bent on dividing our country, perhaps not physically like it happened in 1947,  but certainly, create such a cleavage between us, that we no longer will remain ourselves. I do hope you agree that we need to stand together and steadfastly fight the enemy that has been set loose in our country.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,

Akhileshwari Ramagoud

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Selling body to keep soul


Selling body to keep soul 

By R. Akhileshwari

'Papi pet ka sawal hai’ has been a line used ad nauseam in Hindi films. Yet that is precisely the line that is on the lips of sex workers their dependents and caste members of Eluru in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh. In fact, that is the harsh reality of every sex worker who has to earn through this means to support her family.

While the media expresses horror at the recently-exposed trade in women sex workers in West Godavari district, the government orders investigations, and NGOs get active, everything grows quiet with the lapse of time. Public memory is short; shorter still the newsworthiness and therefore, the ‘life’ of the event in the media. The NGOs find the problem too vast to handle or solve single-handedly. Without active government involvement, the issue seems to have defeated everybody. And so, the sex trade goes on; women continue to leave their homes to work for a livelihood in cities; they remain in the clutches of middlemen or ‘contractors;’ they suffer ill-health and are in constant danger of contracting and spreading the dreaded AIDS disease.

As the demand for sex grows and as employment opportunities for women, especially for those with little education and no skills, are non-existent, prostitution has turned into big business. It was precisely the violation of this business’ unwritten rules that exposed the trade and the issue made a splash in Parliament last week.

Simple business

The way the ‘business’ is conducted is fairly simple: girls, mostly from two communities, Bogam and Dommara, are ‘contracted’ for a period of time, mostly for a year. The amount is negotiated and paid up to the ‘recruit’ family. The girls are taken by the ‘contractor’ to a city, mostly Hyderabad and Mumbai where she ‘works’ in a brothel or a red-light area. The contractor takes care of her boarding and lodging but she has to pay her medical bills, bail or bribes if caught by the police.

She gets to keep 40-60 per cent of her earnings according to the agreement. While a middle-aged woman fetches Rs.5,000 for three months, a teenager can command as much as Rs.25,000 a month. The two Godavari districts have traditionally been a ‘supply centre’ for girls and according to an estimate more than a 1,000 girls from these areas are to be found in Mumbai’s red-light areas.

At the end of the contract period she returns home, takes a break and waits for another or the same contractor to come forward with yet another contract. The district administration and police have denied that women were ‘sold’ or ‘auctioned’ as reported by a newspaper, nor was anyone forced into the profession. The event that provoked the report was the holding of a ‘caste panchayat’ of the Dommara caste to punish the violater of the contract system. A fellow Dommara man took four girls to Mumbai but after the ex piry of the contract period, the girls did not return. Scouts sent to Mumbai returned empty-handed. One of the girls managed to inform the police through one of her customers that they were being held against their wishes. They were rescued and sent home where the girls revealed they had been ‘sold’ by the contractor to a brothel owner. The culprit was pulled up by the caste panchayat and imposed a fine.

Official denial

While denying any ‘sale’ of the girls officials hide the fact that an auction took place along with the caste panchayat. According to the Progressive Organisation of Women, a women's activist group which led a fact-finding team to Eluru, the services of four girls were auctioned, and the bidding started from Rs 1,000. Both the girls and their mothers have denied that any ‘sale’ took place. As soon as the news broke out, three girls who were on their way to Mumbai were brought back fearing police action. The mothers of the girls maintain they were forced to send their daughters to faraway places like Mumbai and Calcutta because the local police had intensified their raids making it difficult for the families to make a living. However, police say that the main attraction in cities was higher earnings, relative ‘safety’ from the police and to some extent, ‘protection’ from the stigma of being a sex worker.

There are big bucks in this business as evident by the prosperity of the contractors and their financiers. Like all businesses, the business too is supported by financiers who lend money to the contractors and the few individual sex workers at an interest rate ranging from 20-40 per cent. According to an estimate, there are about 200 financiers in the two Godavari districts. If sources are to be believed about Rs 50 crore is invested in this business and the daily turnover is as much as Rs 10 lakh. There are no written agreements or surety or a guarantor; mutual trust is the key-stone of the business. According to police sources, each financier makes a profit of not less than Rs.50,000 a month.

Disgraceful

The President of the Progressive Organisation of Women  Sandhya said that auctioning of women's services based on their age and look was a disgrace but she said this was a natural corollary to women being ‘commodified’ in every aspect of today's commercialised ethos. “How is the auction of women's services any different from today's beauty contests and fashion shows?” she asked. The only difference, she pointed out was that sex workers did it for a living as they had no other alternative while women of middle and upper classes take part in beauty shows for fun and to earn money to be spent on themselves. The most important thing is that the educated, middle class and city-based women have society's acceptance for showing off their physical assets and making a living from it whether by modelling or participating in fashion and beauty shows.

“Both are inhuman, both degrade women; both violate the dignity of women. The only thing is that the auction is crude while fashion parades are organised in a sophisticated manner,” said Sandhya. Unless the society changes its attitude towards women, unless more employment opportunities are created for women, and unless we give up our double-standards, Eluru will continue to happen. Eluru is as outrageous as the experience of several women in cities and towns. As they wait at bus stops or cross-roads, for transport, or even while walking in certain areas, how many times has not a car stopped and a door opened invitingly? At times men in the car even show notes hoping to tempt the women.

Sociologists also point out that the problem is that also of social acceptability of prostitution by all classes. Women from the middle classes practise it in posh hotels or big houses in respectable localities catering to an even more respectable and rich clientele. Such social scourges can certainly be lessened if not eradicated provided the government takes up its welfare role more seriously, women's organisations are supported by society and registered NGOs take up issues based on the need to rid society of evils rather than availability of fund.

Published in  Deccan Herald, 13-12-1998

ROTTWEILER, WHO?


IF THE SIGN BOARD IS MEANT TO BE A THREAT, DOES THE HOUSE-BREAKER 
READ ENGLISH?

By R Akhileshwari


Social scientists expound to us the various methods of communication, the how and why of it, theories to explain the finer aspects and importantly, how some of it is effective and some not so effective.


Then there is non communication, according to me. Can we call that an exercise in futility? For instance, a sign on the gate of a house announces 'Rottweiler inside.' As information, we accept it with awe. But as a threat for whom it is meant, namely guys who break into houses, is it effective? Does he know what is a Rottweiler? More basically, does he read English?

Then there is this leading resort in Hyderabad which has given exotic names to its different ventures like P.Heights and P.Valley. The only problem is that 'heights' is flat land and valley is hilly land! In our neighbourhood, a cramped apartment complex is called Rolling Meadows! Sure, it is evocative but may be names should also be less ambitious? An equally ambitious name given to yet another (better built, admittedly) apartment building in the neighbourhood is Vineyard Cedar. Sadly, there is not even a blade of grass growing anywhere in the vicinity, forget a majestic cedar!

The best is this sign that is not a sign really. It is a statement. A funny statement at that. It says, "Forget the dog, beware of the owner." Those who communicate have hit upon this brilliant idea of putting up 'no parking' signboards with the name of the institution or product. So every gate in the neighbourhood, of an apartment complex or an independent house, has stuck to it this commandment, the 11th, I believe, that thou shalt not park in front of the entrance.

I regularly pull out the signboards put on my gate by obliging salesmen or what ever these gentlemen are called and dump them in the garbage. Not because I want all and sundry to park in front of my house but I find it a futile exercise. If we can and often do park right under the no parking sign with the fine amount specified put up by the cops on the busiest of roads (at least in Hyderabad), nothing will deter a determined car driver/owner from parking where he pretty much wants to! I found a soulmate the other day. His sign said "Kindly do not park here." Now, that sounds much nicer than the shout, no parking!
It is certainly more respectful. But is it effective? Don't know but mate, I am moving on.
Published in Deccan Herald

Friday, April 13, 2012

The Curse of being the youngest


The Curse of being the youngest
          By R. Akhileshwari

            The sum total of a personality is arrived at after a highly complicated process of accretion of experiences, involvement in simple and complex circumstances, the mistakes committed as one lives and lessons learnt from those experiences. I firmly believe we are born with certain inherent advantages or disadvantages by which I don’t mean the socio-economic or the pre-determined genetic inheritances. The most deciding factor of what you become depends on your rank in the family. The woes of being the eldest of are different. Worse, I think, are those of the youngest. The thesis I propose is that the first borns become the autocrats of this world and the youngest the democrats. At least in our society where hierarchy--familial, social and economic---is most pronounced and implemented fanatically.
            Being the youngest in a family of eight children, I should know. The unwritten rules governing behaviour in a family are inherently unjust and followed implicitly. All rebellion is promptly crushed, nipped in whatever stage it is: in the bud, after it has flowered or in full-fledged adulthood. The curse of being the youngest haunts you to your last days.
            The youngest fetches and carries all that can be fetched and carried for the older siblings, from shoes and socks to a glass of water. If salt has to be fetched from the kitchen when the family has begun its dinner at the table who should get up to get it but the youngest? And should the elder forget to take the towel to the bathroom who should rush to the rescue of the dripping older sibling? The youngest, of course. And is there is a word of thanks? A gracious smile for the pains taken? You must be joking.
            The youngest is often an object of experimentation for the older siblings. Your older brother has learnt to ride a bicycle. He sweetly offers you a ride and you fall for the generosity. The next moment you have fallen on the ground and as you yell the loudest yell of your life it is gratifying to see the autocrat begging you to lower your voice so that the Pater or Mater don’t turn up at the scene and give him what he dishes out regularly to the lesser of his siblings. My experiences on the pillion of the cycle are all at once horrifying and painful. At one time, my foot got entangled in the rear wheel of the cycle ridden  by an older sister. At another time,  I narrowly missed being trampled over by a herd of cattle as an older sibling, a learner on the bike, lost his nerve on seeing the herd looming ahead and crashed into it headlong. The bicycle became such an object of terror that I never even tried getting on to it and as a result, have had to suffer the ignominy of admitting that I couldn’t bicycle. I got on to one only when I was nearing 30 years of age, and that too only to learn “balancing” to be able to ride a scooter.
            The youngest or younger ones are always given the tasks nobody else wants to do. These include borrowing sugar or milk or even Rs.100 or whatever amount is needed to tide over the month end, from a neighbour, or getting some urgently needed stuff from your neighbourhood kirana store whose bill has been overdue by several weeks.
            The younger ones are victimized in many ways. I recall I was once walking my older sister to the bus stop. I was in high school and she in the university and since it was a holiday and I wanted to do a good deed, I accompanied her to the bus stop. As we were rushing at great speed to make it to the bus stop before the bus did, I heard a horrified shriek. My sister stopped in her tracks and seemed paralysed. As I followed her stare, I was equally horrified. She had worn a blue slipper in her left leg and a yellow one in the right. Those were the days of matching slippers and we had a collection of slippers of rainbow colours. You can guess how this tragedy ended. She cajoled me, begged and made extravagant promises. I had to give in; there was hardly any choice. As she walked away triumphantly in my pair of slippers, the saree hardly showing her feet, I in my short skirt, walked a marathon race, head bowed, heart-beating with shame of people noticing my feet dressed in two starkly different coloured slippers. You will get my point if you picture the scene with the roles reversed. Would elder sister have suffered humiliation for her younger sister’s sake? Or would she have ordered her to go home change her slippers, take the next bus, and assign the special class to hell? And then top off with a lecture that she needed to learn to manage her time better, that this was an appropriate lesson for her not to repeat such stupidity again?
            The past was recalled with vengeance when Amulya, my younger daughter contradicted her Didi’s contention during a gossip session with a friend  that she did not believe in riding roughshod over the younger sibling as some other elder sisters did. “Oh-ho, don’t tell all lies,” said the 10 year old Amulya who was a quiet audience till then. “I don’t tell lies,” retorted 17 year old Dipa with the superiority of an older sibling. Stung to the quick, Amulya shot back:“You think I have forgotten what you did the other day? I have not.” Amulya has the memory of an elephant (in true tradition of the youngest). “You stood outside and made me go into the meat shop to buy kheema. And I saw a dead goat there. Its eyes were open,” said Amulya, ever perceptive, shuddering at the recollection. Poor Amulya. She has already learnt that the younger ones don’t have choices. At least not when ordered by the older ones.  
Ends

On being a Reporter and a woman

By R Akhileshwari*

A woman professional encounters numerous problems including prejudice and sexual harassment in the course of her duty in a patriarchal society. A woman reporter is no different.  The extent to which her functioning is affected depends how strong she is mentally, where she is located, that is, whether she is in a still-traditional Asia, Africa or fairly advanced (in terms of women’s status in society) Europe or USA and how committed she is to her job. Having been a reporter for a quarter century in India, as Deccan Herald’s foreign correspondent in Washington DC, USA and as one who has travelled across the world on reporting assignments, one has experienced the best and worst of being a journalist.
          These recollections were set off by the horrific experience of Lara Logan, chief foreign correspondent of the American news network CBS, in Tahrir Square in Cairo, Egypt as she was covering the fall of President Hosni Mubarak following the uprising against his despotic rule. On February 11, 2011, as Lara was filming the unfolding events, she was attacked by a frenzied mob, separated from her team and rescued after 20-30 minutes by Egyptian soldiers and some women. Lara suffered injuries ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/15/lara-logan-suffered-bruta_n_823677.html ).  Even as this incident (typically) was attempted to be suppressed by CBS, even as male reporters publicly (on Twitter) made insensitive and sexist comments about Lara wanting to beat a male colleague (of CNN) who had been earlier assaulted similarly by a mob (http://www.popeater.com/2011/02/15/cbs-lara-logan-hospitalized-after-brutal-sexual-assault-in-eg/), of having got her deserts for ‘war mongering’, women activists urged women journalists everywhere to share their experiences considering the harassment experienced is pushed under the carpet by the women themselves out of fear of either being called back or kept out from ‘risky’ assignments or of being seen as less capable than men in some situations (http://www.judithmatloff.com/correspondentsandsexualabuse.pdf).
          My experiences have not been any different from those of women reporters elsewhere though fortunately they have not been as brutal as those of Lara Logan. I will share only one experience here that illustrates the problems women reporters face in the course of doing their job. If some men discourage us, there are others who support; if some men run us down, there are others who egg us on; if some men resent our achievements, there are others who recognize our talent and give us our due; if some refuse to co-operate, others go out of their way to help us.
           Back in 1990, when I had returned to Deccan Herald as its Andhra Pradesh correspondent quitting a university teaching job, my editor K N Hari Kumar asked if I was game to cover Namibian independence and later, if visa came through, perhaps even go to South Africa that was in throes of delirious joy on having dismantled apartheid and the release of the iconic Nelson Mandela from two-decade long incarceration. I didn’t think twice before saying yes even though two daughters, two and seven years old had to be taken care of.
          At that point, an average Indian knew just two things about South Africa: apartheid and Nelson Mandela. Only a few were aware of the fact that South Africa has a sizable population of Indian descent. And they knew even less about Namibia.
          Therefore, when I announced my editor’s decision to depute me to Namibia (to cover its independence on March 21, 1990) and South Africa, friends and relatives were horrified. They tried to dissuade me: “Why Africa, for God’s sake? Ask your editor to send you to the US or Europe.” Stereotypes of backward, tribal Africa and the prestige associated with a ‘developed’ USA and Europe were not scarce.
          But any journalist would barter her or his soul to be in Namibia and South Africa and witness history in the making, I argued. Namibia was getting independence from South Africa after 75 years of subjugation by the white ruling elites and South Africa itself was on the threshold of a new era of equity and justice and assertion of Black South African. With the release of Nelson Mandela, it had initiated the process of sharing power with the blacks and dismantling the horrors of apartheid.
          Ironically, even those who were familiar with these two countries gave no encouragement. A senior journalist and an expert on Namibia told a colleague of mine in Delhi that there was utter chaos in Namibia with every nerve being strained to accommodate VIPs and their entourages from about 147 countries and 20 heads of states. Besides hordes of journalists and TV crew from across the world had descended upon the country which was then the last country to throw off the colonial yoke. “And to top it all, you are sending a woman,” he told my colleague.
          My colleague however was confident of my ability to survive. He insisted that we meet this leading journalist-expert on African affairs notwithstanding his misplaced fears, to get a background briefing on Namibian and South African affairs. When we met, the expert was even more blunt. “Don’t go,” he advised me. All accommodation in the capital Windhoek (pronounced ‘windhook’) had been ‘commandeered’ by the fledgling government for the historic occasion and it was not advisable to go without confirmed accommodation. “Don’t be stupidly brave. Go back home,” said my guru-of-the-hour. I protested. I was not expecting five-star hotel luxuries. I will rough it out, share a room with five others (or more) if necessary.
          “You will be lucky if you can get even that,” said the sceptic expert. “Carry a rucksack. You will need it,” he said giving up the battle to din some sense in me. This advice came from a much travelled, much experienced journalist as my colleague and I stopped at his house hours before I left for the airport. Such was his insensitivity that his fears seeped into me, shaking my resolve. In the taxi, I confessed my fears to my senior who was accompanying me to see me off on my first trip abroad. He dismissed his friend’s dire predictions and assured me that I was made of sterner stuff and that his friend did not have the benefit of knowing me as my colleague did. I was assured, but only just. The butterflies in the tummy continued to flutter agitatedly.
          A sample of the problems ahead was given at the Indira Gandhi international airport in Delhi. At the various counters I had to go through, my intended destination, that is Windhoek, had the airlines staff scurrying to their colleagues for help. The girl who took my ticket did not know where Windhoek was. She went to a colleague who in turn went to a computer. He came back and asked, “Where is Windhoek?” In Namibia. “The computer says it is in South Africa. We can’t allow you.”
          A short lesson on the recent political developments, of South Africa relinquishing its rule over Namibia, of its forthcoming independence and the fact that I was a reporter assigned to cover the event convinced him of Namibia’s status. But, he insisted, I needed a visa even to pass through Johannesburg in South Africa enroute to Windhoek. I repeated what my travel agent told me, namely, a visa was not needed for a transit halt of one hour in Jo’burg. He was not convinced. I kept a tight leash on my temper. “Please clarify from your boss,” I suggested sweetly. “The computer is my boss,” he responded without blinking.
          The human boss whom I insisted on seeing was no less rigid. Either I sign an indemnity bond saying that I would bear all expenses in case I was sent back from Johannesburg for not possessing a visa or I won’t be allowed onto the plane, he informed. I signed pronto. I was not going to miss out, despite ill-informed computers and airline staff, the biggest event of the decade, the dawn of independence on Namibia.
          Yet my 10-day stay in Namibia proved anything but inconvenient. True, there was no accommodation to be got for love or money but there were plenty of people who were helpful, especially Indian government officials, a large contingent of whom had descended upon Namibia to ensure that the then Prime Minister V.P. Singh’s first tour abroad went off without a hitch. For two days, I had to make do with “borrowed accommodation”.
          On landing in Windhoek, I went to the only quality hotel in the town in search of Indian embassy officials, the first stop of help to travelling journos, to help me out. At the hotel I did not find any Embassy officials (considering India did not have diplomatic relations with South Africa in pursuance of its policy of boycotting racist regimes) However, when I ran into fellow Indians and discovered that they belonged to the Indian Overseas Communications who had arrived ahead of the PM’s contingent to take care of communications of the entourage, I poured out my woes of having no accommodation. Two officials offered their room (and eats) to me for a few hours to freshen up as they would not be using their room for they were busy setting up the communications logistics for the Prime Minister’s party and Indian journalists contingent accompanying the PM. That helped me to relax up enough to scout around for accommodation. It was available—a white Namibian agreed to accommodate me as his paying guest after great hesitation and opposition from his wife and son. I was a ‘black,’ but for the money he was getting from me, he was willing to suffer my ‘blackness’.
          When I announced my triumph to the newly made friends of IOCs (who had earlier pleaded inability to help) they were scandalized at my naivety and even willingness to be exploited. They offered to put me up in their room provided I did not mind having to share a room with two men. I was game. Something is better than nothing. But there was a hitch. The room would be available only with the arrival of the Prime Minister and his party which was two nights away. That did not resolve my problem of having no place to spend two nights (even if the days were spent in filing news stories)
          Another helpful official offered to shift into his friend’s room in the majestic Kalahari Sands Hotel and offered his room for the two nights. But there were two conditionalities: the fact that I would sleep in the room gave me no claim over it beyond one night, and that I would raise no protests on being asked to vacate the next morning. I instantly agreed to write off all my non-existent rights to his accommodation for one night. Two, I will not order any room service. He did not want to be left to deal with unpaid bills for services he did not use. My friend-in-need was apologetic that he could offer me only one night’s accommodation and that he himself, along with other officials, would be shelterless from the next day since the Namibian Government had commandeered all hotel rooms for its guests and the Indian mission officials had been given marching orders.
          The next day was hectic—I tried to get familiar with Windhoek, the media centres (Namibian and Indian). I got lost in the process. But managed to file a curtain-raiser and amazingly, ran into a Telugu-speaking journalist. Telugu never sounded sweeter and Telugu men were never so good to be with! He shared the info that the South African media was throwing a party for the foreign media persons at the prestigious Namibian press centre and the Namibian President-designate Sam Nujoma (pronounced nuyoma) was expected to drop in later in the evening. The reporter who was with a news agency had just committed a cardinal journalistic sin, of sharing and cooperating with a competitor. But the joy of finding one’s own on foreign shores has the strength of melting away petty professional rules.

          Windhoek proved a shock, defying all my pre-conceived notions of an African city. I had expected it to be crowded, dirty, chaotic. But Windhoek, which had barely 1.2. million people, was totally modern with high-rise buildings, plush insides, auto banks, carry-outs, wide, immaculate roads, and highly disciplined traffic which comprised cars to the exclusion of every other kind of vehicle. Windhoek was a city of cars. Car is a status symbol with every white family owning one, some two. However, there are a few blacks who owned cars but lived invariably in slums. The wide roads and thin traffic is a joy to the Windhoek motorists. They think nothing of zooming at 100 kmph in the city. A culture shock was the fact that motorists stopped dutifully at red light on chowrastas even at midnight when there would be not a single vehicle in sight!
          Another culture shock was the fact that there was no public transport system in Windhoek. The poor who lived in areas designated for blacks under the apartheid system, about 15-20 km away from Windhoek (a “whites only”), travelled to their workplace in the city in taxis which are run by blacks. These taxis are nearest to a public transport system. They were cheap and frequent.
          Apparently, the poor and the underprivileged, almost all being blacks, never figured in the scheme of things of the racist colonial government. Facilities were created to serve the specific purpose of the rulers and not for the benefit of the local people. For instance, the highways in Namibia were very wide and in perfect condition, not merely to facilitate traffic but also to double up as landing places for helicopters and smaller planes in the rocky land of Namibia in the eventuality of a rebellion by the blacks or an attack from a hostile neighbour.
          Windhoek went dead by 6 p.m when business came to a halt. With shops closing down, the black workers stream out of the city and head for Katatura and Khomasdal, the black townships. The whites retire to their well-fenced and protected homes. The few restaurants are crowded, exclusively by whites. The only places that are open after 6 pm are the bars and take-away joints, which are frequented by blacks.
          Alcoholism, gambling and other vices were rampant among black men—because there is no entertainment worth the name and because, of the widespread unemployment of 35-40 per cent. Then, there were very few movie houses and TV undeveloped in content. In any case, it was too costly a luxury which very few blacks could afford. The “people entertainment” comprised soccer and music.
          The evening in Namibian Press Centre was a boon. A team of Indian officials had arrived to oversee the facilities for the Indian media (which then comprised the newspapers, All India Radio and Doordarshan). On hearing of my homelessness, the top official decided that I too was eligible for the government-provided accommodation and other facilities. But the only hitch was the building that had been prepared for the Indian media contingent would be unoccupied since the party was arriving only the next day. Would I be brave enough to spend a night in a room all by myself in a building that would have no women and very few men? Beggars have no choice, so I agreed. At the end of the evening, I vacated from the hotel room and with great relief and not a small amount of trepidation checked into the media building. The room would have to be shared with another journalist, the official incharge informed me sheepishly. No issues, I assured him. It is a male, and he is with AIR, he said. No worries, I said. They would be checking sometime in the middle of the night, he said. As I went to bed looking forward to March 21 evening when the newest independent country would join the galaxy of free nations, I noticed two beautifully wrapped packages placed next to each bed. I ignored them as the day’s events had been too much and the comfort of an assured accommodation had chased out all other thoughts. I was woken up sometime in the night with the arrival of my fellow journalist. He asked if I would move out into another room considering that I might get disturbed by his work. He was from AIR and he would be filing his stories and updating them through the next two nights. I assured him that I had the ability to sleep through an earthquake too. The next morning he informed me that he was moving out to be closer to a fellow AIR colleague. Hooray! I had the room to myself and happily he hadn’t used the bathroom, bless him. Only later I realized that my gifts, left carelessly on the floor where they had been placed by the Indian official, had disappeared. The male journo had decided that a female journo had no use for a bottle of Scotch and a carton of Marlboro cigarettes!
          The day was spent filing another story on Namibia and in evening, the authorities shepherded us into a bus to take us to the stadium where a free Namibia would be ushered into existence. The seniors were happy to sit in their rooms and watch the event on live TV but I wanted to live the event. The atmosphere was electrifying. I experienced what I had missed by accident of birth: August 15, 1947.
* Former Special Correspondent of Deccan Herald,  presently, Head, Dept of Mass Communication, Loyola Academy, Secunderabad.

Monday, January 17, 2011

All world loves lovers? Naah!


            Good old Shakespeare once said all world loves lovers. Do they? May be in England of Shakespeare. Not so in India if we are to go by the evidence we have.
            A youngster in the throes of his/her first love (or even second or third) has no freedom either in the house or outside to speak of the thrill or pain of the experience. They can share with nobody without being put down. Nor can the couple even meet to stare into each other’s eyes without drawing stares of disapproval from others around them.
            Never make the mistake of having a rendezvous in the neighbourhood where you live. Not only the neighbours will look at you suspiciously and convey the information to your parents but even the locality’s Big Man’s (industrialist/contractor) watchman will give you a tongue lashing if he finds you talking with your favourite. He is also the keeper of the area’s morals, you see. If you have to talk go somewhere else, the watchman once advised a young couple in my neighbourhood, rather roughly. When the young man resented this unsought for advice the watchman bristled and raised his voice and advanced threateningly, forcing the youngsters to retreat in the interest of peace. Lovers, you see, are quite vulnerable to the self-appointed moral policemen.
            An incident in Osmania University in Hyderabad showed the moral police at work. A boy who was speaking to a girl around 9 pm outside her hostel on the OU campus was beaten up by a group of boys as a punishment. However the girl was outraged. She roped in fellow ideologists of the Red variety and lodged a complaint against the moral policemen which were of the saffron variety. It is another story that the cops did not follow up but a point had been scored in favour of youngsters. How dare anyone impose their morals on others!
            Only in India and I suppose in most Asian societies others’ affairs of the heart is the business of the neighbours and even the entire community. The idea of privacy and the right of the individual to go where the heart leads, with the person of one’s choice apparently is foreign to our people. The woes of the people in love apparently moved the former chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Farooq Abdullah. He must be the only politician to instruct the police not to harass lovers who frequent parks and gardens to seek solitude in each other’s company away from prying and frequently disapproving eyes. In a garden on a university campus, every now and then the watchman goes about poking the bushes with his lathi and when young girl and boy emerge from them, he shoos them away, I suspect, with spiteful glee. Not everybody is Farooq Abdullah, you see.
            Some even find the young lovers easy prey. A group of teenagers comprising two girls and two boys were stopped by the police in the night as they were driving back after a party in a resort on the city outskirts of Hyderabad. All papers were in order but the police threatened to take them all to the police station and call their parents. The boys pleaded; the cops relented but only after emptying about Rs 1000 from their two purses. In another instance, desiring to escape from prying eyes a college-going couple decided to take refuge in the abundant rocks outlying the city. Parking his brand new motorbike the young man guided the girl up the highest rock and sat down for some heart-to-heart talk. Their joy was shortlived. From literally nowhere villagers emerged and threatened the couple with dire consequences if they did not stop 'polluting' the pristine environment. Rocks as the last resort? No way!
            There is hope though. The other day I took an NRI friend to see the latest showpiece of the city, on Hyderabad’s outskirts, the Hidden Lake or Durgam Cheruvu. The park has plenty of original shrubbery, natural rocks and trees around with themes worked around them. And for a change, it was not crowded with one billion people. The only crowd was under trees, behind the rocks and hidden behind the shrubs, two-somes who were lost to the world. Durgam Cheruvu is a paying park. The entry fee is a deterrent for the undesirable elements such as noisy kids, voluble parents and screaming vendors. There seems to be at least one positive aspect of liberalization, thank God!
ends

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Accentuating Commonalities

The wise people have said that all of us are same at the deeper, spiritual level while seeming to be starkly different outwardly. May be there is something to this argument although one finds it difficult to imagine it. How are we one? How can we be one? I am quite convinced that it is possible to be one if we forget our differences, or if we don’t allow the differences to prevail. Contradictory, right? But we do live our contradictions daily. For instance, we don’t agree with every opinion, behaviour or action of our loved ones like husband, children, parents and siblings. But we do live together as we don’t allow the differences to prevail.
Even when they do, the disagreements are temporary. Ultimately, we allow our love and our commonalities to prevail. This state of affairs is a daily experience. Acceptance-rejection, love-dislike, agreement-disagreement are inevitable with not just our loved ones, relatives, colleagues and neighbours but even with ourselves. The pulls and pressures of anger, greed and grievances are constant but mostly they are overcome by love, need for peace and the instinct for survival. The exceptions are precisely that, simply exceptions. The general rule is that we carry on merrily. Just as we have done for hundreds of years as Hindus and Muslims and Christians, as upper castes and lower castes, as vegetarians and non-vegetarians, as Dravidians and Aryans, as blacks and not-so-blacks.
          This should be the context in which Shabana Azmi’s statement on being a Muslim and not finding a house in Mumbai should be looked at. Her confession of her travails prompted other films stars like Saif Ali Khan, Arshad Warsi to voice similar experiences. Actors like Farhan Akhtar however have disagreed.
          Shabana has received much criticism both from moderates and extremists, for her statement. From the former because they don’t want to disturb the sleeping dogs and from the latter because they think minorities in their part of the world should be grateful for being allowed to exist. In subsequent interviews, Shabana explained that such issues were marginal but they came in handy for the extremists to rake up issues.
          Often, we stereotype people and allow our prejudices to define them. One meets with prejudice all the time. Ask a woman, ask a Dalit, ask a minority, ask a single mother, ask a transgender. Often, we assert our power, as a senior, superior, elder, belonging to the majority religion, speaking the majority language, as a male, employer, and as house-owner. We find a security in commonalities because it is an emotional need and these commonalities differ in different contexts. For instance, I am an Indian first and foremost when I live abroad. Similarly, I am a South Indian in Delhi, an Andhra in Bangalore, a Telanganite in Andhra region, a Hyderabadi in Secunderabad, a Hindu among Muslims and a Muslim-supporting Hindu among Hindus.
          On my own house-hunting sprees some years ago in Hyderabad, I was blatantly asked by prospective sellers about my religion as then I did not wear any overt religious symbols on my self; a Muslim builder helpfully suggested I look at another apartment since the one he was building was meant only for Muslims; a Muslim doctor-couple from Mysore, comforted by my connections to Karnataka, confessed in indignation that not just Hindu buyers but even Hindu tenants are not allowed in their apartment building. Once, an autorickshaw driver was hesitant to take me to a specific locality in the Old City. “But only Muslims live there,” he informed me wondering why an obvious Hindu-looking woman wanted to go there. “My Amma lives there,” I told him confusing him further. She does. Bibamma as we call her is a Muslim woman who gave me unbounded love in my childhood and whom I visit now and then to renew my belief in fellow human beings.  
          During my stay in Washington DC some years ago, I was invited by a Muslim single woman to spend an evening with her friends, all of them being Muslim (interestingly, there used to be minimum, if at all any, socialization between Indian Muslims and Hindus in the USA.) Some of the invitees were Pakistanis. Later I found out that my friend had to take the permission of the local Mulla to invite a Hindu to her home since Hindus are rarely allowed into their social get-togethers!  
          Then, there are travails of the non-vegetarians in cities like Ahmedabad. A friend recalled how he had to lie to rent a house from a vegetarian. Since cooking meat at home was out of question, the family would go to extraordinary lengths to hide the fact whenever they bought cooked meat dishes from a hotel. They would eat in secrecy, not daring to even heat up the dish for fear of the smell giving them away, then light plenty of agarbathis to ‘cleanse’ the home, collect the bones in a plastic bag and dispose it off in a dustbin far away from their neighbourhood to avoid being detected!
The travails of the upwardly mobile Dalits are no less. They do not get homes on rent, they even face two-glass system in their workplace, they are transferred to posts nobody wants, and are overlooked in promotions. A Dalit minister in AP publicly rued the fact that she had a servant problem since nobody wanted to clean the dishes and wash the clothes of a Dalit however important a public figure she was!
          While all these instances are real, faced daily and most of us are traumatized for being who we are, this is not the entire picture. The other side is we gloat over our secular and inclusive traditions, revel in the poetry of Kabir and qawwalis of Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, admire B R Ambedkar for his amazing intellect and his gift of freedom through the Constitution to all of us, get inspired by Abdul Kalam and thrown into depths of despair by Shah Rukh Khan’s Devdas, stirred by Amir Khan’s Lagaan, rocked by the romantic Saif Ali. And where does A R Rehman fit in all this? In the depths of our soul, of course, where else? This is India meri jaan. Thoda khatta, thoda meetha, thoda namkin. An unbeatable mix. That is why we have survived for ages.